The other night I was out with a few friends, and in a discussion about movies, one person revealed that she had a large, color-coded DVD collection of her favorite movies, ranked for each category. Naturally, we had to ask: “What are your categories?” and “What are your favorites?” We were not disappointed. Perplexed, but not disappointed.

Among her collection the largest section was the romantic comedy section. Fair enough. How to Lose a Guy in Ten Days? When Harry Met Sally? HitchThe Notebook?

No. The Mummy Returns.

Yeah, that’s right. The Mummy Returns. The 2001 fantasy/action movie starring Brenden Fraser, Rachel Weisz, and Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson (so you know it’s good), in which an Egyptian corpse is resurrected (again) in an attempt to raise an ancient army of unspeakable evil, only to be destroyed (again) by our protagonists.

How romantic!

Naturally, we gave her a lot of grief for this. Not only is it a B-rate sequel, it is neither romantic nor comedic, making it a fairly ridiculous choice for someone’s favorite romantic comedy. For her, thought, it didn’t matter that the couple in the movie was already married with a son, had no moment of “falling in love,” or the fact that their relationship was but a minor subplot to the overall direction of the movie (you know, the whole resurrected mummy trying to destroy the world bit). What made it her favorite was the love the two had for one another in the midst of conflict, how having a child made them love each other more, and the sacrifices they were willing to make for one another.

Interesting.

While I stand firmly unconvinced in her assertion that this movie is a romantic comedy—let’s be clear about that… it’s ludicrous—The Mummy Returns offers a rare Hollywood example of the love of married life. When we think about “love stories,” there are a lot of movies about falling in love (e.g. How to Lose a Guy in Ten Days), and a lot of movies about old people looking back on a life well-lived in love (e.g. The Notebook, Up), but there are very few movies about growing in the love that people have already found. It’s as if people fall in love and then jump to “happily ever after,” with nothing in between. Where are the struggles? Where are sacrifices made for one another? Where is the satisfaction of raising a child? As strange as it is to admit, there is something admirable about The Mummy Returns showing that love is not something that people simply fall into and then they get old, it is something that has to be worked at, and believe it or not, can even be stronger more than a decade in.

Pope Francis echoes this idea beautifully in his latest apostolic exhortation, Amoris Laetitia. Quoting the bishops of Chile, he writes, “the perfect families proposed by deceptive consumerist propaganda do not exist. In those families, no one grows old, there is no sickness, sorrow or death… Consumerist propaganda presents a fantasy that has nothing to do with the reality which must daily be faced by the heads of families.” He goes on to say, “Joy also grows through pain and sorrow… After such suffering and struggling together, spouses are able to experience that it was worth it, because they achieved some good, learned something as a couple, or came to appreciate what they have. Few human joys are as deep and thrilling as those experienced by two people who love one another and have achieved something as the result of a great, shared effort” (Amoris Laetitia: 130, 135).

I couldn’t agree more. As much as we popularly hear about the “honeymoon stage,” how dating and the first few years of marriage are the most exciting and so every marriage should try to hang onto it for as long as possible, people who have been happily married for a long time will say the complete opposite: the “excitement” of the first few years might have faded, but their love for one another has grown. While a story about paying bills, raising children, coordinating busy schedules, and living an overall domesticated life is not something that Hollywood producers are rushing to theatres, it can be through those things—the mundane and trivial things that couples have to work hard at to accomplish—that will build stronger bonds of love than a million romantic first dates or an endless supply of butterflies in the stomach.

As someone who is not married and does not plan to get married, I can say that the same is true about religious life as well. When I entered the Order, all of the friars were new to me, every ministry a open book of opportunities, and the very idea of living as St. Francis a romantic notion straight out of a book. It was a romantic step in my life, in a way, leaving the norms of the world to do something radical. Now, I know most of the friars, have seen all of the ministries and know how they work, and have realized that the romance of the life is lived through the mundane routine of prayer, work, and fraternity, all of which I know very well. The life I live now lacks the idealism and excitement that the first few years offered.

And that’s a good thing.

The life I live now as a friar is so much better than all the idealism and excitement of when I entered. With the passing of time, there is depth in my relationships; satisfaction in having overcome challenges; comfort in knowing what’s next; and even, despite the disappointment and frustration, a stronger assurance in my vocation that I’m in the right place. These are not things I would trade for romance I felt in the beginning, nor are they things that can be felt immediately. They take time, and they take effort.

So, just like having a conversation about favorite romantic comedies with a friend of mine, you could very easily ask me about my life as a friar, “Where’s the romance?” To that I would simply say, that in movies, in marriage, and in the life of a friar, there’s more to life than falling in love. Sometimes, we need to talk a little more about growing in the love we’ve already found.

After one of the longest and most negative campaigns in US history, many hoped that our lives would go back to normal come November 9th: no more ads on tv, no more divisive Facebook posts, no more talking about politics in everyday life.

And certainly no posts on Breaking in the Habit about politics.

Unfortunately (and my deepest apologies about that last one), that is not where we are. In some ways, the political talk has increased in number and severity. Protests have begun. Arguments have flared up even more on Facebook. People are retreating to their corners—proudly victorious or ashamedly crushed—to remain as far apart as ever.

There exists a great divide in our society and in our Church.

And as much as we can point to the outcome of the presidential election as the direct cause of this added division and turmoil, that, had it have gone differently—had our candidate won, or had “X” won the primary instead—there would not likely be the crazy turmoil we face now—numerous protests, spike in hate crimes and planned KKK rally—the fact of the matter is this election did not cause our problems… it simply brought them to light. 

The problems of hatred and divisiveness we feel in our society and Church today existed long before these candidates ran for office. And they will exist after them too.

No matter how one feels about either candidate (and Lord knows there are some strong and diverse opinions among BitH readers) neither one is ultimately responsible for situation we are in. Donald Trump did not create racism, sexism, or xenophobia; the fact that he exhibits such behavior and has emboldened people to express such sentiments more publicly in recent months is disappointing, but those things existed, silently and not-so-silently, long before him. Hillary Clinton did not create abortion; the fact that she supports it as a policy is disappointing, but people were getting abortions long before Hillary voiced her support of it.

In many ways, what we see in these candidates (both the things we love and hate) is not so much something new or transformative, an attempt to convince people to adopt an altogether new opinion. No, what we see in these candidates is a reflection of the world we live in and how we treat each other. As radical as one may find either’s policies or rhetoric, what they have presented is merely the calculated sum of opinions that were held before them and will be held after them.

I point this out, not to downplay the effect that this election has had on the nation or to somehow diminish the power that the president can have on shaping its future (as Mr. Trump’s formidable 100 day plan indicates.) I point this out to say that, no matter who was elected on November 8th, the destructive opinions of the losing party were not simply going to go away, and the constructive opinions of the winning party were not going to solve everything.

As Christians, those who only have one King (and He’s in heaven), we knew from the start that the winner of this election would not be able to bring us the Kingdom we await. No matter who won and no matter what positive policies were put into place, we knew that there were gaps that needed to be filled and areas of justice needing defending. We knew, no matter how much we liked one candidate over the other, that it was not up to him/her to be our savior, and that, in some ways, they would even bring trouble. We knew that.

And so, as much as we were all hoping to our lives would go back to normal, that we could check out and let others take care of our problems, we’ve always known that that could never be the case. Voting for and electing officials is an important part of our life as Christians, but it is never the end in itself; we vote for and elect officials as means to a greater end, a just and peaceful society for all to authentically develop. Let’s never stop short of that end, and never forget that our work has just begun.

This week is National Vocation Awareness week. From November 6-12, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops is asking all of the faithful to pray for new vocations, to encourage those around us, and to discern in our hearts what God might have for us to do. I ask that you join me in doing these three things.

But what is a vocation? A derivative from the Latin vocare, “to call,” to have a vocation is less about what one does or is, and more about who wants it done. A vocation is a calling from God to build up the kingdom.

Traditionally—and what the USCCB is primarily focusing on this week—the only things that were considered “vocations” were priests, religious brothers and sisters, and permanent deacons. Consecrated celibate life. God called people out of their normal lives to do something more, something special, something better than regular old marriage. God didn’t need to call people to married life or to be teachers or to serve the public.

Today, that is not our understanding of God and His call. The fact of the matter is, as baptized Christians, we are all called by God to build up the Kingdom in a special way. When we were baptized into Christ we were baptized into His threefold ministry: Priest (bringing people closer to God and praying for the world), Prophet (announcing the Kingdom and teaching the world), and King (working for justice and governing the world). While, yes, in the official Church, ordained priests, religious, and deacons exercise these three roles to a much greater extent than the laity and so are critically important, there is more to the Kingdom than the official structure of the Church! What about educating children? Planning cities? Running businesses? Providing food? Healing through medicine? These things are not just nice things for a society to have, they are the very foundation a people needs to have the luxury of a working Church. They are, in a very real way, the work of God. And those who dedicate their lives to them—when they act as God’s priests, prophets, and kings in the world—have just as much of a calling from God as ordained priests, religious brothers and sisters, and deacons.

For that reason, I once again ask you to join me in doing three things: praying for vocations, encouraging others, and discerning a calling from God on your own. But in doing so, I ask that you broaden your understanding of what it means to be called by God to see all the many things that God’s Church and Kingdom needs, and realize that, as I present to you in this video, if God wants to work through someone, He’s going to do it. All we can hope for is the courage to say yes and the trust to follow wherever He may lead us.

And… if you’re looking for a really easy way to take part this week, how about sharing this video with someone who might have a call from God or on social media? For those on email, click here to view.

In the Parable of the Sower (Mk 4:1-20; Mt 13:1-23; Lk 8:1-5), Jesus uses an analogy of a seed in different types of soil to exhort the people to be receptive to the Word in their lives and to bear fruit with it in the world. Bad soil—a heart that is cold, stony, or fearful—will choke the seed, whereas good soil—a heart that is open and willful—will help the seed reach its full potential and nourish the earth. It is among the most commonly recognized parables, and despite the disciples’ inability to understand it without explanation, it’s one that we understand quite well: good soil produces better results.

But despite its clarity, there is often a temptation with parables to take their analogies to the literal extreme, using our imagination to come to conclusions that were not intended. For instance, some might see us (especially those who minister in the Church) as taking on the role of the farmer, the ones who distribute the Word. It’s a logical connection, for sure. And as farmers, if we accept that seed scattered on rocky soil does not produce much fruit, then we might conclude it to be irresponsible to spend time and money carelessly dropping seed where the best results won’t come. Right? And if that’s the case—continuing with the analogy of the Word presented by Jesus—it might lead us to conclude that our spiritual resources as ministers should be carefully distributed only to those who are prepared and willing to receive the Word. It might lead us to falsely believe that the growth of the Word depends on us, that it couldn’t possibly grow unless we are perfect.

But we are not the farmers. And we do not make the seed grow.

As anyone who owns a driveway or walks on a sidewalk knows, plants continually find a way to grow in the most inhospitable conditions, surviving harsh weed killers and constant pruning, even breaking through concrete and cement to flourish.  Not only do they overcome less-than-ideal conditions without good soil, they manage to grow despite our best efforts to stop them from doing so. They may not produce “a hundred or sixty or thirtyfold” like that of the good soil, but they can still produce good fruit.

And so it is with the people of God.

It is not our decision to determine who will receive the Word and in whom it will begin to grow. Despite all odds, goodness can flow with abundance. Despite years of sinfulness and obstinance, conversion can create someone anew. Sometimes, it has nothing to do with the soil and nothing to do with the attention the farmer gives it… the Word simply grows. It fights through the cracks, it overcomes the toxins, and like an abandoned parking lot after many years, comes to reclaim the space as its own to flourish and produce more fruit.

As ministers, people who are often stretched very thin with the many needs of the community, it can be very tempting to act as a prudent farmer, someone who counts the cost and calculates what will produce the best return, overlooking the people and things that offer us little opportunity for success. It can be very tempting to look at those who are “rocky soil” as not worth our time or energy because we believe that nothing good can come of them.

But we are not the farmers. And we do not make the seed grow.

When we forget this, reading this parable not as a call for openness in our lives but as a blueprint for who deserves our help, we limit greatly limit ourselves and our work. As Fr. Gregory Boyle, S.J. writes in his famous book Tattoos on the Heart,

If our primary concern is results, we will choose to work only with those who give us good ones.

When become the arbiter of what is possible and what is not, seeking after the cases that will turn out well for us and writing off others as lost causes, we run the risk of overlooking the grace of God in our midst and an opportunity to nurture what could be an abundant harvest one day in heaven.

And it’s tempting to do so. When we have a room full of excited people who want to learn and a homeless person sitting at our door, there is much more of an upside to giving our full attention to the room full of people; it’s good soil versus rocky soil. But here’s the thing… the plant growing in the rocky soil doesn’t care that it’s not as big, that it’s a more difficult case, or that it has a lower upside. It just wants to survive. And it can survive.

Jesus is not a stingy farmer that counts the cost and so only plants the seed in the good soil, He plants it everywhere. As ministers, it is not our role to choose where to plant the Word, it is simply to nourish and encourage it wherever it can grow.

Have you spent much time with a child lately? Children have a very special perspective on the world: they see things differently, say things we don’t expect, and ask very interesting questions. This week, I decided to tap into that creativity for a segment of Ask Brother Casey. Going around to all of the classrooms at the Catholic school connected to the parish, I told the students to write down any questions they wanted to ask me—anything—and I would answer them on the Breaking In The Habit Youtube channel. They were happy to oblige…

For those on email, click here to watch the video.